Contributed Post by Anthony Casey | Deputy Dean, University of Chicago Law School

For several decades, private arbitration and mediation mechanisms have been offered up as the ideal alternatives to our costly system of civil litigation. I recall reading endless articles about the time-saving potential of arbitration as a first-year law student in 1999. But for many lawyers on the ground, the promise of efficient dispute resolution has proved illusory. Over the years, as arbitration proceedings have increased in frequency, the costs have also risen to the point where many lawyers—and even some arbitrators—lament a move to arbitration as merely a trade of one costly labyrinth for another.

And yet the promise is not lost. In fact, the legal market is now at an inflection point where recent technological advances present a unique opportunity for the legal industry to radically change its approach to arbitration. With those advances, the promised benefits of arbitration are not just within reach but are immediately accessible. 

This is part of a larger technological revolution in the practice of law. As I have written elsewhere, advances in predictive analytics and communication technologies have the potential to fundamentally change how judges decide cases and even how laws are made.  But, whereas those changes are still on the horizon, several advances that have the potential to dramatically change arbitration and mediation procedures are here today.

Advances in computing power and interface design present new opportunities for streamlining the preparation, organization, and decision of cases. The speed with which materials can be submitted and analyzed has increased rapidly. Parties need not wait months to present evidence and arguments to a court or arbitrator. Rather they can—if the arbitrator lets them—upload the relevant materials in a matter of days. These technologies can also transform complex legal procedures into straightforward interactions that provide opportunities for more direct and personal involvement of the actual parties to the arbitration. 

Similarly, the last year has revealed huge advances in communication technology that can make long distance hearings more meaningful and more personal than ever previously imagined. Arbitrators, lawyers, and potential parties have acquired a familiarity with video conferencing and other presentation technologies that can facilitate a new level of remote arbitration. This technology will make it far easier to connect expert neutrals to geographically distant litigants—and at significantly lower cost. 

Finally, the ability to collect data about past cases and use it to inform new decisions has expanded in recent years. As more and more cases are decided through streamlined arbitration, the precedent of those cases will become data that can be understood and processed in a fraction of the time and cost of traditional case research.

While the legal industry sits at this inflection point, these advances provide the opportunity for major disruption in our arbitration system. But, if history is any indicator, courts and traditional arbitration platforms will be slow to adapt. They will not lead the innovation. Rather the change will have to come from a market entrant willing to take a fresh approach to alternative dispute resolution, one that recognizes the potential to harness new technologies in order to slash costs and push for faster case resolutions without sacrificing accuracy. Only with this type of maverick innovation will the legal industry realize the promise of arbitration as a game-changing alternative to civil litigation.  

More New Era Insights

Learn About Alternative Dispute Resolution

Hear stories from inside the court system and learn more about how ADR mediation and technology is offering a new path for dispute resolution.

Structure and Process of Practicing Law and Mental Wellbeing

Structure and Process of Practicing Law and Mental Wellbeing

It is estimated that twenty-one million adults in the United States have suffered at least one depressive episode.  That represents approximately 8.4% of the adult population.  Attorneys are nearly three times as likely as the average adult to suffer from depression....

Students Deserve Third Party Title IX Proceedings

Students Deserve Third Party Title IX Proceedings

Sexual Violence is Increasing on US Campuses Higher education has unfortunately been plagued by Title IX scandals in the past. With reputation, funding, enrollment, recruitment, and retention at risk, colleges and universities are inherently conflicted. In 2015, U.S....

Mother Earth v. Traditional Litigation

Mother Earth v. Traditional Litigation

In the race to evolve without destroying our planet, many industries are reluctant to disrupt traditional procedures or established centers of influence. However, without innovation, we can’t solve for the new threats to our physical and digital worlds. On the...

The Promise of Due Process in 21st Century Litigation

The Promise of Due Process in 21st Century Litigation

Both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution state that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” “Due process of law…” what does that mean? For words written hundreds of years ago, we can’t...

Get Started

Get Instant Access To Rapid Dispute Resolution

Create your free New Era ADR account and accelerate the resolution of your disputes.

Create My Account